Thanks! well - it all comes down to what you expect. the 70-200 plus a 2x is a compromise in weight, size and price. If you happen to have a 70-200 f/2.8 and no budget left of a good tele then the 2x gives you the possibility to get a 400 f/5.6 but it won't be near to a prime in this range. hOIo. 70mm = 7.20'. 1200mm x 800mm Subject Framing Distance. 24mm = 914mm. 35mm = 1278mm. 50mm = 1784mm. 70mm = 2195mm. Review. Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens. Find support for your Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM. Browse the recommended drivers, downloads, and manuals to make sure your product contains the most up-to-date software. Grab a high-performance F2.8 Contemporary zoom and give yourself another reason to celebrate. Shop 16-28mm F2.8 Shop 28-70mm F2.8 50 Years in Aizu We’re celebrating half a century in Aizu, Japan, where every SIGMA lens, camera, and accessory is made. The price hike from f/4 to f/2.8 is worth it. The price hike from Mk II to Mk III is not. These are my opinions, and I hope I've helped you make an informed decision. Best of luck any which way you go! Whatever you choose, the 70-200 lenses are amazing, and you shouldn't be disappointed! TL;DR: Buy a used Mk II from eBay. Get the f/2.8. 1. None. 200 mm is not enough for wildlife. Get the 100-400. If you insist on 70-200, the IS mk II is the best. The f/4 version is much lighter, cheaper and optically also very good, but wild animals are often best photographed around dusk and dawn and in otherwise bad light. For backpacking you shou look into either the EF-S 55-250 STM or the 70-200 f4 IS. Add a 24mm f2.8 pancake and you have a similarly-capable package in a fraction of the size, weight, and cost. •. No, let me tell you this. It holds value and 2nd hand market is high so after few years you'll only be spending 400+.

canon 70 200 f2 8 dimensions